Channels are welded to PIMs.
Ten sites and two portals read directly from a specific PIM. Replacing the PIM means rebuilding every integration.
01 · MULTI-BRAND GROUP
A group of technical brands, grown through acquisitions, runs three PIMs and a dozen websites. PIM Gate gives every brand and country its own branded portal and one API for all sites — and becomes the bridge on which the PIMs underneath are consolidated.
“The group decided to consolidate its PIMs — and every website, portal and feed is wired to one of them.”
02 · SITUATION
The group owns four brands of technical products and sells through seven country subsidiaries. Each acquisition brought its own systems: one brand runs Akeneo, one Pimcore, one an in-house product database; the fourth maintains data in the group's ERP and spreadsheets. Together about 180,000 articles in eleven languages.
Every brand has its own website, some country subsidiaries run their own sites, and each site is integrated directly with "its" PIM. Dealer portals exist for two brands, built on different technology. Group key accounts buy across brands but get separate catalogs from each.
The group has decided to consolidate on one PIM over the next 18 months. The risk everyone sees: every consolidation step breaks a website, a portal or a feed somewhere.
| BRAND × SYSTEM · TODAY | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| BRAND A | AKENEO · 3 SITES | DEALER PORTAL (CUSTOM) |
| BRAND B | PIMCORE · 2 SITES | — |
| BRAND C | IN-HOUSE DB · 4 SITES | DEALER PORTAL (CMS PLUGIN) |
| BRAND D | ERP + XLSX · 1 SITE | — |
03 · CHALLENGES
Ten sites and two portals read directly from a specific PIM. Replacing the PIM means rebuilding every integration.
Each brand and country needs its own look, domain and range — even when the data comes from one place.
Key accounts buying across brands get separate files, formats and price logic.
Each brand translates on its own; shared terms are translated four times, differently.
Attribute names, units and classifications differ per brand. A group-wide view needs a canonical schema first.
The subsidiaries' businesses cannot stop for a cutover weekend, and a failed step must be reversible.
04 · THE PIM GATE SETUP
PIM Gate reads from every PIM the group runs today and maps them to one canonical schema. On top, each brand and country gets a branded tenant with its own domain, look and portals, and all websites use one API. When the group consolidates, the migration bridge switches sources attribute group by attribute group — the channels above never notice, and every step can be rolled back.
Diagram, tab "Now". Akeneo, Pimcore, an in-house database, ERP spreadsheets and the group ERP feed PIM Gate, which maps them to one canonical group schema. Above it, twelve branded tenants for four brands and their countries, each with customer and sales portals, and one API serving ten websites. Diagram, tab "During consolidation". Old PIMs and the new group PIM feed PIM Gate in parallel. Sources are switched per attribute group from old to new, with rollback per group. Portals, tenants and websites stay unchanged.
One memory, four brand voices
05 · WORKFLOW
Akeneo and Pimcore via their standard connectors, the in-house database via a custom connector, brand D's ERP and spreadsheets via scheduled SFTP. Nothing changes in the source systems.
Attributes, units and classifications of all four brands are mapped to one schema. Differences become visible — and are decided once, at group level.
Each gets its domain, look, languages, range and portals. Group sales additionally gets a cross-brand view for key accounts.
Websites move from their PIM integration to the PIM Gate API, one site at a time, filtered by brand and market and synced by delta.
A group translation memory for eleven languages, a termbase per brand, review by the country teams.
When the new group PIM is ready for a brand, the migration bridge switches that brand's data attribute group by attribute group. Versioned exports show every difference before and after; any step can be rolled back.
06 · MODULES & PORTALS
PIM connectors Akeneo, Pimcore (and Viamedici, Stibo, Censhare)
Brand A and B sources
Ingestion XML · REST pull · scheduled SFTP
Brand D and group ERP
Custom connector
In-house product database of brand C
available now (add-on)
Canonical schema · attribute metadata
Group data model
Source → canonical mapping UI · safe cutover
Mapping four brands
PIM migration bridge (old + new in parallel, rollback)
Consolidation without channel disruption
Multi-tenant platform · tenant subdomains · custom domains
12 branded tenants
White-label branding per portal
Brand look per tenant
Customer Portal
Dealers per brand and country
Sales Portal
Cross-brand view for key accounts
Supplier Portal (optional, included in L)
One set of submission rules for all brands' suppliers
Versioned REST API /v1 · delta sync · webhooks
One API for ten websites
Product-data translation (shared TM, brand termbases)
Eleven languages
SSO OIDC/SAML · SCIM
Group identity provider
Attribute/text inheritance
Shared texts inherited across brands
07 · EXPECTED EFFECTS
Each site integrated with its own PIM
All sites on one API — the PIM behind it can change.
Consolidation as a big bang
Consolidation per brand and attribute group, each step reversible.
Separate portal technology per brand
Branded tenants on one platform, each with its own domain and look.
Four catalogs for group customers
One cross-brand view scoped to the group agreement.
Four translation setups
One group memory, brand-specific terminology.
Attribute chaos across brands
One canonical schema, decided once.
Qualitative expectations for this scenario, not measured results.
08 · TYPICAL CONFIGURATION
Group product data, brand marketing and country e-commerce teams add up to 26–100 seats; 180,000 articles fit the ≤ 500k band; eleven languages need Version L. L includes ten branded tenants and all three portal modules; two more tenants cover the remaining brand/country combinations. Dealers, reps and key accounts are portal users — unlimited. Indicative list price €29,100, EUR, annual prepayment, excl. VAT. Includes 99.9% SLA.
| Item | € / year |
|---|---|
| Version L — 26–100 seats, ≤ 500k SKUs, all 3 portal modules, 10 branded tenants, unlimited languages and connectors | €20,400 |
| 2 additional branded tenants (per tenant) | €2,400 |
| Custom connector for the in-house database · annual | €1,200 |
| Stage/test tenant · half capacity (25% of Version L) | €5,100 |
| Indicative list price | €29,100 |
09 · ROLLOUT
WEEKS 1–4Group schema and tenant plan. Attribute comparison of the four brands, canonical group schema, tenant and domain plan, API contract for the websites.
WEEKS 5–10Brand A end to end. Akeneo connected, brand A tenants and dealer portal live, first website switched to the API.
WEEKS 11–24Brands B, C, D. Remaining sources connected (incl. custom connector), tenants per country, websites migrated one by one, cross-brand sales view.
MONTHS 6–18PIMs underneath. As the group PIM goes live per brand, the migration bridge switches sources per attribute group; parallel running until each brand is signed off.
AFTER SIGN-OFFRetire old PIMs. Old sources disconnected once all attribute groups run on the group PIM; channels untouched.
Indicative plan. Consolidation timing is set by the group's PIM project, not by PIM Gate.
10 · NEXT STEP
Bring your brand-by-system map. We sketch the canonical schema, the tenant plan and the order in which channels and PIMs move.
11 · Keep reading
Every version kept, every change traceable, every migration reversible.
Attach the PIM, ERP and supplier files you already run — without touching any of them.
Six entitlement layers, enforced on the server, recorded append-only.
Put a gate between your catalog and chaos.